Effectively implementing laws on violence against women requires community support. Drafters should include an interagency, coordinated community approach when mandating the implementation of laws addressing violence against women.
What is a Coordinated Community Response?
Coordinated community response (CCR) programs should:
(See: Sexual Violence and the Spectrum of Prevention, National Sexual Violence Resource Center (2006))
CASE STUDY – Romania
Romania passed domestic violence legislation in 2003 and a coordinated community response in one region has changed the way that a community deals with domestic violence. In Mures district, local NGOs that run a crisis center coordinate with local police and emergency medical units to support victims and hold perpetrators accountable. The coordinated community response program was supported by UNFPA, through the creation of local multidisciplinary coordinating teams. In Mures district, local NGOs approached the police to engage them in improving the response to domestic violence cases. The district had begun using an integrated information system for reporting, screening, and referring cases of domestic violence. Building on that initial integration, NGO workers, health providers, and police began a dialogue about how to encourage women to file complaints. Women had traditionally had little trust in the police and the police had been reluctant to get involved. After a year of working collaboratively with the police, more cases began to be referred to the crisis center. In addition, police began working very closely with the NGOs – regularly taking the initiative to check up on cases, attending awareness-raising vigils, accompanying crisis center staff on home visits to former clients, and even stopping by the homes of former victims on their own to check in. In addition, a building has been refurbished to act as an alternative location for victims to file complaints with the police – many didn’t want to go to the police station because it was very public and very crowded. Partners in the effort credit the local coordinating committee, the police involvement, and the initiative of local NGO workers with the program’s success. See: UNFPA, Programming to Address Violence Against Women: 10 Case Studies, 11-20 (2007).
(See: Domestic Violence: Legislation and its Implementation, 40-45, UNIFEM (2009))
CASE STUDY – Coordinated Community Response in Minnesota, USA
The US state of Minnesota has been a leader in the development of coordinated community response programs related to domestic violence. On of the first programs was in Duluth, Minnesota, a mid-sized metropolitan area with a population of approximately 250,000. In the early 1980s, eleven local agencies came together to begin planning a multidisciplinary approach to protecting women from domestic violence. These agencies included 911, police, sheriff’s and prosecutors’ offices, probation, the criminal and civil courts, the local women’s shelter, three mental health agencies, and a newly created coordinating organization called the Domestic Abuse Intervention Program (DAIP). The Duluth Model of coordinated community response (CCR) is recognized internationally as a leading tool to help communities eliminate violence in the lives of women and children. The model focuses on stopping domestic violence through written procedures, policies, and protocols governing intervention and prosecution of criminal domestic assault cases. Four primary principles guide the model:
Twenty years later, the city of Saint Paul, Minnesota in coordination with Praxis International developed a cutting edge domestic violence CCR program to coordinate the work of critical agencies. Saint Paul’s judicial district, court administration, police, prosecutors’ offices, correctional system, emergency response agency, sheriff’s office, and local advocates came together to create a “blueprint” (a highly detailed, foundational document) for how to build an effective criminal justice response to domestic violence. The resulting Blueprint for Safety includes specific guidance for every agency, including what victims need to be safe, what workers need from each other to do their jobs, and what is required by each worker and agency to hold an offender accountable. The Blueprint lays out key foundations for its coordinated response:
See: Praxis International, Blueprint for Safety.
The public authorities will draw up collaboration plans which ensure the organised rollout of initiatives for the prevention and prosecution of gender violence and the care of its victims, which should involve the health authorities, the judicial authorities, national law enforcement and security agencies, social services departments and equality organisations.
Protocols will be drawn up in implementation of these plans whose procedures will ensure a global, integrated effort by the various authorities and services involved, and secure the evidence stage during the proceedings under way.
Article 19 states:
1. The female victims of gender violence are entitled to receive care, crisis, support and refuge, and integrated recovery services. The organisation of such services by the Autonomous Communities and local authorities shall reflect the principles of 24-hour attention, urgent action, specialised care and professional multidisciplinarity.
2. Multidisciplinary care shall in all cases involve:
a) Information to victims
b) Psychological assistance
c) Social assistance
d) Monitoring of women’s rights claims
e) Educational support to the family unit
f) Preventive training in the values of equality conducive to their personal development and their skilling in non-violent conflict solving.
g) Support to employment training and insertion.
3. Services shall be organised to ensure the effectiveness of their delivery by means of staff specialisation and one-stop capabilities.
4. Such services will act in coordination with each other and in collaboration with the Police, Violence against Women Judges, the health services and the institutions responsible for providing victims with legal counsel, in the corresponding geographical zone. They may also apply to the Judge for any emergency measures they deem necessary.