(1) Law Enforcement Reform Efforts
An example of broad legal systems reform related to improving the police response to domestic violence is the implementation of policies or laws that change the way in which, or the conditions under which, officers may, should and must make arrests. For example, in cases involving simple or minor injuries, "probable cause" arrest policies allow police officers to make arrests based on the presence of evidence (such as damaged property, visible injuries, or a frightened woman) that would lead to the conclusion that an assault had occurred. Police may make the arrest without witnessing the crime. Mandatory arrest policies take this one step further and require the police to make an arrest at the scene of a domestic assault. See: Law Enforcement Reform Efforts, StopVAW, The Advocates for Human Rights.
(2) Prosecutorial Reform Efforts
Another example of legal system reform has been in countries that have created dedicated domestic violence units within prosecutor's offices—that is, teams of prosecutors who prosecute only domestic violence cases. Many prosecutors' offices have policies that provide for prosecution of cases without the victim’s testimony, if there is sufficient independent evidence. These policies are sometimes referred to as “evidence based” or "absent victim" prosecutions. Such a policy sends the message to the offender and the community that the state sees domestic violence cases as a community priority. (See: Prosecutorial Reform Efforts, StopVAW, The Advocates for Human Rights, 2006)
Prosecutors' offices have also sought to improve their response by developing ways to provide victims and witnesses with additional information and support. Some offices coordinate with battered women's groups to provide these services, while others have created a victim/witness advocate position within their offices to assist victims throughout the criminal proceeding. (See: Prosecutorial Reform Efforts, StopVAW, The Advocates for Human Rights, 2006)
(3) Judicial Reform Efforts
Advocates can work to improve judicial responses to domestic violence in a number of ways. However, advocates should be aware of the state of the judiciary in the particular country where reform will be advocated. The American Bar Association (ABA) Rule of Law Initiative measures progress in judicial reform with its Judicial Reform Index (JRI), an assessment tool comprised of 30 objective factors against which a judicial system can be evaluated. See: ABA Rule of Law Initiative Home, Judicial Reform Programs.
Advocacy for judicial system reform may take the form of court monitoring, training, dedicated courts and processes. Court monitoring, for example, helps to systematically identify needed improvement in judicial responses. The results of the monitoring can be used to advocate for improvement in the system. Monitoring also increases the visibility of these issues; the presence of monitors in courtrooms can itself cause judges to improve their handling of domestic violence cases. Trainings for judges can provide judges with the information they need to better address the needs of battered women and ensure batterer accountability. See: Role of the Judiciary, StopVAW, The Advocates for Human Rights, 2006. Court monitoring has been effective in many countries, including Macedonia and Brazil. Link to Court Monitoring, 36, Monitoring Section of this Knowledge Asset.
CASE STUDY: Liberia’s Court “E” for Sexual Violence
As the West African nation of Liberia began its recovery after two decades of internal conflict and civil war, the plight of women victims of sexual violence was desperate. After a civil war in rape and sexual violence were used as a war tactic with complete impunity, Liberia saw the same pattern of impunity repeating in the post-conflict era. The Advocates for Human Rights, Liberia is Not Ready: 2010, 35. After passing a new law against rape in 2005 but seeing rape cases move too slowly through the regular courts, women’s rights groups such as the Association of Female Lawyers of Liberia, determined that a special court was necessary to focus exclusively on sexual violence against women. After two years of advocacy, the establishment of Court E was approved. With the support of the UNFPA a new building was constructed, training for prosecutors and police was begun, and cases have begun moving through the court. When the court opened, more than 140 people were awaiting trial on rape charges. The court has exclusive original jurisdiction over cases of rape, sodomy and other forms of sexual assault including abuse of minors. Special Court for Sexual Violence Underway, IRIN, March 21, 2008; Liberia – The New War is Rape, AllAfrica.com, Nov. 19, 2009.
(4) Inter-Agency Reform Efforts
Prosecutors, judges, advocates, medical personnel, law enforcement, emergency medical technicians, family and community members can also work together to improve the government response to violence against women by creating domestic fatality review boards. These review boards examine domestic violence related deaths including the events leading up to the death(s) in order to determine what lead to the homicide(s); but also to study the particular case at hand and similar cases to identify systemic issues that contributed to the offender’s actions and the failure to protect the victim. See: Domestic Fatality Review Boards, StopVAW, The Advocates for Human Rights, 2006. The St. Paul Blueprint for Safety is an example of an inter-agency reform effort that focuses on criminal justice agencies. The Blueprint includes specific guidance for every agency, including what victims need to be safe, what workers need from each other to do their jobs, and what is required by each worker and agency to hold an offender accountable. (See Case Study: St. Paul Blueprint for Safety, 25, Implementation Section of this Module)